From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Savannah-help-public] Bazaar does not fit in GNU Arch hosting [Was: Bazaar and savannah don't like each other] Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:12:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4854DD11.5040908@gmail.com> References: <19e566510806141007s762a33bex56b1d03470498ff1@mail.gmail.com> <20080615090505.GA10162@perso.beuc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213521199 13426 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2008 09:13:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:13:19 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , savannah-hackers@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 15 11:14:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K7oJF-0006hL-Pi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:14:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33212 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7oIR-0002kL-GC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7oII-0002hj-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7oIG-0002fj-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39611 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7oIC-0002d0-Sh; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:51475) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K7oIC-0004gY-O2; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:64283 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K7oIA-0000FS-7S; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:12:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <20080615090505.GA10162@perso.beuc.net> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080615-0, 2008-06-15), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1K7oIA-0000FS-7S. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1K7oIA-0000FS-7S f98c605601213770a834675efb82df76 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99250 Archived-At: Sylvain Beucler wrote: > (Plus, sftp access is so slow that it is bad advertising for bzr ;)) What is the problem with sftp? I know nothing about this but I searched and found a message on CPAN saying sftp would be faster if Math::BigInt::GMP was installed: http://www.cpanforum.com/posts/3778