From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this a bug in overlay property list handling? Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:50:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4845AE99.6060108@gmail.com> References: <484272B3.3020004@gmail.com> <48459F8A.8070705@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212526382 30517 80.91.229.12 (3 Jun 2008 20:53:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 03 22:53:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3dUB-0002Yh-EX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:52:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3dTP-00081D-5f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:51:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3dSq-0007dZ-BF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3dSo-0007bL-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:50:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51582 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3dSo-0007b7-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:50:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:45245) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3dSo-0002t3-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:50:38 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:64557 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K3dSl-0004Yy-9T; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:50:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <48459F8A.8070705@gmail.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080603-0, 2008-06-03), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1K3dSl-0004Yy-9T. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1K3dSl-0004Yy-9T 7e75bbfbb523113f45728bb64c8a8b05 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98331 Archived-At: >> Also the >> `(parse-partial-sexp (point-min) last-pos) looks odd: you probably >> forgot a comma before `last-pos'. > > Yes, I did. Thanks. This was the bug. It works as I expected after adding the comma.