From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; emacs-report-bug fails silently Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:04:00 +0200 Message-ID: <484257F0.7050107@gmail.com> References: <87fxs0hrrv.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <4840084C.2020405@gmail.com> <87d4n3ii41.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <48407716.5080704@gmail.com> <874p8fi9op.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <484117DC.1060003@gmail.com> <87skvxc1mh.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212307518 15825 80.91.229.12 (1 Jun 2008 08:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Florian Beck Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 10:05:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K2iYs-0003Np-VL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:05:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iY7-0004EA-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iXy-0004DU-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iXw-0004Cy-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48899 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iXw-0004Cv-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42163) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iXw-0002wT-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:40728) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iWB-0003xb-2R for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:02:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iXr-0002v6-HQ for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:41181) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iXr-0002ug-1K for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:63631 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iXp-0001Hd-5S; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:04:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87skvxc1mh.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080531-1, 2008-05-31), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1K2iXp-0001Hd-5S. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1K2iXp-0001Hd-5S 3776670d4c90db64b9307f29cf3fec02 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98170 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22517 Archived-At: Florian Beck wrote: >> Otherwise could you check what is happening when you try to send a bug >> report? Is `mailclient-send-it' called? > > It is not. It is only called on darwin and windows-nt. From > `send-mail-function': > > (if (and window-system (memq system-type '(darwin windows-nt))) > 'mailclient-send-it > 'sendmail-send-it) > > Now, I think this bug bites anyone who > - is not on darwin/windows-nt (where mailclient-send-it might be able to deliver) > - has not configured sendmail and > - has not configured mail-user-agent (or reports from emacs -Q) > > Am I wrong? No, I think you are right. It looks like the logic have to be revised a bit. Perhaps in addition to the above it is necessary to try and send a mail and check the result?