From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaun Johnson Subject: Link question Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:57:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4834626C.4060101@slugfest.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JysYe-0002g6-8F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 13:57:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JysYc-0002f2-HE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 13:56:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49104 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JysYc-0002ey-9R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 13:56:58 -0400 Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.89]:1620) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JysYb-0008Oe-UX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 13:56:58 -0400 Received: from slugfest.demon.co.uk ([80.177.204.141] helo=[192.168.100.4]) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67) id 1JysYZ-000K3U-5h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 17:56:56 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode I'm a light user of Orgmode so the following might not be sensible or there might be some existing way to achieve the same effect. I have an Org file like: * Glossary ... ** Address ... * Implementation ... ** Address ... What I would like is to have distinct links to the two 'Address' headlines. I can't see a way to this with the standard link types. A possible solution would be to introduce a 'path based' link type where the two 'Address' headlines have distinct paths through the outline tree of ("Glossary" "Address") and ("Implementation" "Address"). Does this make sense or am I gibbering? If it does make sense then my Elisp skills are probably up to implementing this. Thanks in advance, Shaun.