From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintenance suggestion on an emacs mode Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:20:52 +0200 Message-ID: <480FA834.6040108@gmail.com> References: <87wsn667kw.fsf@gmail.com> <87d4ojxgj2.fsf@gmail.com> <87zlrlskgd.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> <87lk35wr0u.fsf@gmail.com> <87fxtdjg1z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fxtcs4rh.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208985688 13276 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2008 21:21:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ralf Angeli , Chong Yidong , Paul R , Emacs Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 23 23:22:03 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JomPh-0001wa-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:22:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JomP1-0004Au-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JomOw-00049z-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JomOs-00048d-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43161 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JomOs-00048W-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JomOr-0003oK-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63165 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JomOm-0002KN-6R; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:21:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080423-1, 2008-04-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JomOm-0002KN-6R. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JomOm-0002KN-6R d571c486ec803b1311293d89a2ae4116 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95866 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Maybe we could apply his change, but make C-c the default (i.e. the >>> default is to break the convention). So it would still be easy for >>> someone to unbreak the conventions. Moving the code doing the key bindings to the defcustom reftex-extra-bindings makes it a little bit easier to change the bindings. It seems easy enough to also add code to remove the key bindings. Would not that be enough instead of breaking the key binding conventions? And should not the doc string for this defcustom say something about that it nearly breaks the conventions?