From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Bold screen fonts have been unbolded Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:46:17 +0100 Message-ID: <48048779.1070401@gnu.org> References: <86ej97o43e.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <480477DD.4080702@gnu.org> <86abjvo2hh.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208256460 6242 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 10:47:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 12:48:18 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlihU-0007FQ-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jligq-0007RF-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jligk-0007ND-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jligi-0007KV-D7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jligh-0007KA-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jligh-0003Sy-L2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jligh-00018H-B1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlige-0003SE-1y for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JligY-0003QR-Tn; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:46:47 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 59783510/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAPskBEhTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBXqp8 X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2008 11:46:39 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775A549; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:46:42 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: <86abjvo2hh.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95257 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22029 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > Jason Rumney writes: > > >> There appear to be various problems with italic and bold variations in >> the new font backend. The momentary proper display while dragging the >> window may be because of a bug where the old font code is called in >> some circumstances. >> > > Interesting. > To clarify, I was speculating on a possible explanation for that wierd behaviour, though I did notice the old font code being called for blinking the block cursor a few months ago on Windows.