From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:49:41 +0200 Message-ID: <48027FF5.9000905@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480208C8.3030401@gnu.org> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> <4802756C.6000005@gmail.com> <480277F4.3040500@gmail.com> <851w59qwn5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <48027C3D.8060507@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208123408 5245 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2008 21:50:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 13 23:50:44 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlA5z-0000r5-8I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:50:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlA5L-0001EZ-6k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlA5H-0001C0-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlA5G-00019n-AW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlA5G-00019X-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlA53-0003Nj-N2; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63727 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JlA51-0001Ud-5U; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:49:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <48027C3D.8060507@gmail.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080413-0, 2008-04-13), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JlA51-0001Ud-5U. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JlA51-0001Ud-5U a4e278ac6e86381c17d342501c5645ba X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95134 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > David Kastrup wrote: >> "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: >> >>> Juanma Barranquero wrote: >>>> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> By recognizing that it has recieved WM_CLOSE. I tried to say that >>>>> this >>>>> should be handled as a kind of "quit" in those cases. >>>> Why should clicking into the [X] box interrupt useful work without >>>> asking? >>> It is the user that is clicking the [X]. Maybe there should be a >>> question if the the ongoing work should be interrupted though. >> >> If I have two frames, and start some calc command in one frame, then >> click [X] on another frame, I don't want the calculation to stop. If >> Emacs can't close the frame "out of processing order" then I'll just >> have to wait for the calculation to finish, or stop it manually. > > But if you have two frames and click [X] then Emacs does not want to > exit so this problem should not occur then. (There will be no WM_CLOSE.) Eh, that was wrong. I have forgotten how it work, I thought there was a special message for exiting. But if I am right now sending WM_CLOSE to the last window/frame means "exit application" in w32 message language. BTW, I just saw that there is an API IsHungAppWindow that considers the application hung if it has not called PeedMessage the last 5 seconds.