From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:27:13 +0200 Message-ID: <48027AB1.7060501@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> <4802756C.6000005@gmail.com> <480277F4.3040500@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208122059 739 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2008 21:27:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 13 23:28:15 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jl9kA-0001yw-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:28:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9jW-0000gE-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9jT-0000fz-5T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9jQ-0000fn-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9jQ-0000fk-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9jJ-0008AA-CW; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63661 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9jH-000327-71; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:27:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080413-0, 2008-04-13), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Jl9jH-000327-71. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1Jl9jH-000327-71 bc4df0cc7c3ea3b76310df044ea3165b X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95132 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) > wrote: > >> I do not know what can be done in those circumstances, but I guess that the >> window and message framework is still there. (This depends on exactly how >> the exit is implemented.) In that case I would think it is best to interrupt >> that loop to. > > You have not yet answered my previous question: how do you > differentiate between useful work, and looping forever? With a > timeout? I tried to answer it by saying that if Emacs recieves WM_CLOSE (or something similar on other platform) then the user has decided to exit Emacs. But you have a point. I guess it would be reasonable to ask the user if the ongoing work should be quitted before exiting.