From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:04:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4802756C.6000005@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480208C8.3030401@gnu.org> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208120743 29204 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2008 21:05:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 13 23:06:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jl9OT-0003LI-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:05:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Np-0002nO-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Nj-0002je-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Nh-0002gW-MA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Nh-0002gJ-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9NZ-0004LN-RG; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63621 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9NY-0002a3-3k; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:04:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080413-0, 2008-04-13), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Jl9NY-0002a3-3k. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Jl9NY-0002a3-3k 8c4e4df8a9673b9230854131e47b1bb0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95127 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) > wrote: > >> Well, that is what I wanted WM_CLOSE to do, of course. I just want one >> additional thing first: break out of any loop that makes it impossible to >> exit Emacs in the normal way. > > How will you make Emacs differentiate between a loop that is a doing > valid, useful work, and another one that "makes it impossible to exit > Emacs in a normal way"? By recognizing that it has recieved WM_CLOSE. I tried to say that this should be handled as a kind of "quit" in those cases.