I suspect, then, that it is still a union shop although I wouldn't
doubt that some of the executives are at a different payscale and
not unionized (e.g., because of their role in fundraising).

Even before it was unionized (back when I was there)
we all got paid scale -- which helped make for a (mostly :-)
pleasant environment.

-t


David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> writes:
>
>   
>> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>     
>>> Er, David, it was a joke. 
>>>       
>> No.  The FSF job postings used to explicitly say:
>>
>> "The FSF is a union shop" or "FSF employees are unionized"
>> or words to that effect.   But I've asked what happened off-line
>> rather than perpetuate confusion here.
>>     
>
> I'd be the wrong person to ask, never having been an employee or visitor
> of the FSF and frankly not too sure about the terminology, either.  So
> if there is something worth asking about (and certainly my comments
> don't indicate any knowledge of mine about that), you'd better ask
> Richard or the FSF clerk.
>
>