From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: max-lisp-eval-depth safe upper bounds ? Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:41:41 +0200 Message-ID: <47FCD5A5.9010508@gmail.com> References: <20080408213044.597adc70@reforged> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207752281 16844 80.91.229.12 (9 Apr 2008 14:44:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mike Mattie , emacs developers To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 09 16:45:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjbXq-0002gz-Ch for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JjbXC-0008TL-Oq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JjbUn-0007RS-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JjbUk-0007N2-92 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:41:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JjbUk-0007Mg-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:41:50 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JjbUj-0003aQ-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:60517 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JjbUg-0006Ao-6O; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:41:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080409-0, 2008-04-09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JjbUg-0006Ao-6O. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JjbUg-0006Ao-6O 5a75af5ac70edbe5c1484a924c30aa7f X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94792 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > Mike Mattie writes: > >> What is the safe upper limit for this variable ? > > It depends on the stack limit and the architecture. But is there same way to get this limit from inside Emacs?