Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries

["Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>]

Sascha Wilde wrote:
> martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
>>> FWIW: have a look at http://www.finseth.com/emacs.html
>>> Not every of the more than 100 mentioned implementation will fully
>>> qualify as "yet another Emacs implementation", but be assured there are
>>> more than four...
>> ... as an earlier user of EINE I am assured.
> 
> So no need to tell you about Emacs history, eh?  ;-)
> 
> It seems I got your original point wrong: I thought you were talking
> about the doubled and tripled afford of having different implementations
> of basically the same application. 
> 
> Anyway, regarding the issue of hunspell: there is already a
> ispell/aspell like command line interface included with hunspell
> (including even tex, roff, sgml support).  I had only a very short look
> at it so I can't say how big the differences actually are, but I'm quite
> confident that it will not take too much afford to integrate it with
> Emacs just the way it has been done for ispell and aspell.


I just tested to build hunspell with Cygwin. I was not possible.