From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Lord Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Transient Mark Mode on by default Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:53:34 -0700 Message-ID: <47F2AEDE.2080207@emf.net> References: <87myopnj0l.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20080324200911.GA1310@muc.de> <001e01c88dee$34267e90$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> <20080324210229.GB1310@muc.de> <47F128AA.6000905@emf.net> <87y77ybf3x.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207098925 10546 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2008 01:15:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jared@hpalace.com, "Kim F. Storm" To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 02 03:15:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JgrZy-0006uZ-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:15:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JgrZL-0006qU-OX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JgrZH-0006mR-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:15:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JgrZF-0006ig-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JgrZF-0006iS-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.42inc.com ([205.149.0.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (SSL 3.0:RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JgrZA-0008Lc-Qc; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:15:04 -0400 X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.5 X-TFF-CGPSA-Filter-42inc: Scanned X-42-Virus-Scanned: by 42 Antivirus -- Found to be clean. Original-Received: from [69.236.65.4] (account lord@emf.net HELO [192.168.1.64]) by mail.42inc.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.13) with ESMTPA id 26932138; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:13:22 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94152 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > I don't think we should even consider the idea of changing central > Emacs commands such as C-v or C-x. > > I am not sure if that is in reply to me. I agree, though. And my proposals are consistent with that. If it were the case you thought I said something otherwise, I would want to make it clear that you misunderstood. This doesn't address the question of whether Emacs should take up *my* suggestions. I'm just pointing out some of the logic. -t