From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; uid problems on w32 Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:02:27 +0100 Message-ID: <47EF9D73.4000508@gnu.org> References: <47EEBE03.9030104@gmail.com> <47EEE4D9.9090600@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206885781 7215 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2008 14:03:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 30 16:03:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jfy8A-00028B-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:03:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfy7Y-0004kP-FS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfy7T-0004jQ-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfy7R-0004jB-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfy7R-0004j8-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfy7R-0002cm-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfy7R-0006zC-4J for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfy7N-0002bw-S1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfy7J-0002aM-Pl; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:02:37 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 45987873/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvEGADY670dTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBWqYr X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2008 15:02:36 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10446B6; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:02:36 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93901 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21796 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Actually, one (in `struct passwd') is `signed int', the other (in > `struct stat') is `signed short'. Darn that MS-supplied stat.h! > > Yes, this is probably the reason. > > Jason, do we have any good reasons to use `struct stat' as declared on > the system header? Not that I'm aware, but I'm probably less familiar with that code than you are.