From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Resizing may delete windows Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:48:49 +0100 Message-ID: <47EB5161.5050806@gmx.at> References: <47E42196.8010302@gmail.com> <47E927F4.4000509@gmx.at> <47E9347C.5000905@gmail.com> <47E94B35.4080507@gmx.at> <47E95C8F.4050604@gmail.com> <47E9783C.8060406@gmx.at> <47E982A9.40907@gmail.com> <47E9FD5D.5090305@gmx.at> <47EA1832.1050001@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206604837 27234 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2008 08:00:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , kifer@cs.sunysb.edu To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 27 09:01:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jen2j-0006Xh-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:01:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jen28-00049E-01 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jen12-0003Gp-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jemxy-0001fu-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:56:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jemxy-0001fk-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jemxx-0003x5-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JemsY-0004gO-AX for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:50:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JemsV-0002LY-Fc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:50:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JemsU-0002LH-R2 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:50:27 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 07:50:25 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-40-101.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.40.101]) [62.47.40.101] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 27 Mar 2008 08:50:25 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+rwwJmVLGruxL9UfgJoov8TsnVJp4VCC7nwOHFVC 4cU6SS3DhULTOj User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93624 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21716 Archived-At: > That would be a bad default in my opinion. > It is inconvenient for users if a window gets that small. > The default value for `window-min-height' avoids that > inconvenience. The default value for `window-min-height' asserts that the window may get deleted in that case. Do you think that auto-deleting a window is more convenient than making it that small?