From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; scroll-up gives something between error and message Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:57:05 +0100 Message-ID: <47E84DE1.6030800@gmail.com> References: <47E7F01E.8010608@gmail.com> <47E7FF6E.6040804@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206406674 30042 80.91.229.12 (25 Mar 2008 00:57:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 25 01:58:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JdxUF-00048G-6v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:57:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JdxTe-0002Iy-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JdxTb-0002Id-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JdxTZ-0002IF-O3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JdxTZ-0002IC-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdxTZ-0000cZ-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JdxTY-0003wS-So for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdxTV-0000bS-O6 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdxTV-0000b0-9N for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:64957 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JdxTT-0002ve-4r; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:57:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080324-0, 2008-03-24), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JdxTT-0002ve-4r. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JdxTT-0002ve-4r 3f36e4a75e7cfbf3937968c27efa3172 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93365 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21678 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> There is something strange with the error handling in scroll-up. When >>>> calling (scroll-up 1) in an empty buffer execution of the function calling >>>> it stopped and a message is given. However there is no error generated. >>> What makes you think no error is generated? > > >> There is no traceback, but yes I did not try. > > Your test shows that an error is indeed signalled. > Check debug-ignored-errors. Oh, no, not once again. Sorry. How about adding something to the error string, like "(ignored error)"? Or maybe that is complicated.