From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please add S-tab to button-buffer-map Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:18:50 +0100 Message-ID: <47E1AD6A.6070203@gmail.com> References: <47E16D18.2010209@gmail.com> <47E190B2.6000006@gnu.org> <000601c88a0f$5a7ca5c0$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> <47E1937A.6080808@gnu.org> <47E19FAC.60404@gnu.org> <47E1A2D5.1080105@gmail.com> <47E1A7E7.8050004@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205972360 31662 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2008 00:19:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Drew Adams , 'Emacs Devel' To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 20 01:19:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-forward.uio.no ([129.240.10.42]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jc8VY-0003K0-Rg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:19:48 +0100 Original-Received: from mail-mx9.uio.no ([129.240.10.39]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc8Uz-00044a-FA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:19:13 +0100 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by mail-mx9.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc8Ut-0005th-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:19:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc8Uq-0007dB-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc8Ul-0007cZ-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc8Uj-0007bX-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:18:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc8Uj-0007bU-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc8Uf-0001sx-9d; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:18:53 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63421 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc8Ud-0002Yh-5Y; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:18:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <47E1A7E7.8050004@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080319-0, 2008-03-19), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Jc8Ud-0002Yh-5Y. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Jc8Ud-0002Yh-5Y a6619bdd126e481d0fe718182632e962 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: pass (mail-mx9.uio.no: domain of gnu.org designates 199.232.76.165 as permitted sender) client-ip=199.232.76.165; envelope-from=emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.6, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.41) X-UiO-Scanned: F98AEC4F73F221EE71FA45E58C1427499EE19C0E X-UiO-SR-test: 373DF2BFA9BA1CF6675DD520F3F39722D44B8CEF X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 199.232.76.165 spam_score: -5 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 5 total 43913 max/h 424 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93026 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> But why does the binding to S-Tab in Info work then? > > info explicitly binds it as well as binding backtab. Yes, I noticed. >> IMO it looks better to bind to S-Tab since that is what the user sees. > > If the user looks closely at their keyboard, they might see a backtab > symbol on the tab key, printed in the location where the shifted > representation is expected to be. > > Rather than expecting all modes to bind backtab, S-tab, iso-lefttab and > S-iso-lefttab consistently, to cover all the possible representations > that a terminal might give that key, we use function-key-map to map them > all to backtab. Ah, thanks, I never saw that symbol before and had no idea what backtab was.