From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slow screen updating with Emacs 23 on w32 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <47D5BA3F.6@gmail.com> References: <47D5A2AA.8050204@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205189207 30342 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 22:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Lilja Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 23:47:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYqlz-0005bj-Qi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:47:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYqlR-0002e8-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:46:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYqlN-0002du-Bd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:46:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYqlK-0002di-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:46:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYqlJ-0002df-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYqlJ-0007k9-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63613 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JYqlH-0006yV-4Q; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:46:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 2008-03-09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JYqlH-0006yV-4Q. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JYqlH-0006yV-4Q 3863aad492aefdaeda13c39e29a8673f X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92098 Archived-At: Eric Lilja wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> The screen update is very slow on w32 with current CVS Emacs 23. Is >> that due to the new font handling? >> >> I got crashes before, but I have not got any crashes now. However I >> changed configure to use >> >> configure --with-gcc --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include --cflags >> -fno-crossjumping >> >> Does that perhaps make Emacs very slow? >> >> >> > > How does it perform if you start emacs with --disable-font-backend? Ah, thanks Eric. Performance seems normal again with --disable-font-backend. And the ugly underlines are of course gone.