From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: set-face-attribute :height gacks on floating-point Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:36:09 +0100 Message-ID: <47D3A179.3060501@swipnet.se> References: <87r6ekogs6.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <87d4q4o9it.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <87iqzw34yx.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205052278 23857 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2008 08:44:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eric Hanchrow , emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 09 09:45:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYH9U-0003M1-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:45:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYH8v-0001pr-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:44:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYH8m-0001n0-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYH8j-0001jn-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:44:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYH8g-0001hP-Cg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYH8g-0005RR-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:44:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYH1q-0005DM-Oa for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYH1n-00045I-Vt for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYH1n-00044c-JL for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: by av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6C78D38479; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:37:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.92]) by av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496F038055; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:37:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (90-231-102-24-no59.tbcn.telia.com [90.231.102.24]) by smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66B737E42; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:37:04 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <87iqzw34yx.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91858 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21464 Archived-At: Miles Bader skrev: > Eric Hanchrow writes: >> Stefan> What version is that? >> >> That's the unicode-xft branch, gotten from >> git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git with "git checkout unicode-xft" > > That branch is very out-of-date -- I used to merge to it, but I haven't > in a long time (it wasn't clear that it had any future). > It should be removed, can anybody with CVS access do that? Do we have any policy for removing branches? Jan D.