From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Terrible underline Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: <47D07C24.7010607@gmail.com> References: <47D011C0.6090801@gmail.com> <85hcfj359z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204845627 18288 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2008 23:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 23:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 07 00:20:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXPON-0006gi-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:20:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXPNp-00085V-KA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXPNl-00085B-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXPNk-00084M-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXPNk-000849-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXPNg-00027B-8w; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:60505 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JXPNe-00007q-5r; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:20:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <85hcfj359z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080306-1, 2008-03-06), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JXPNe-00007q-5r. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JXPNe-00007q-5r 45eb68a24aff94b0c477f33c742bfb06 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91562 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >> I get terrible underlines with CVS Emacs 23, see the attached >> picture. I guess this has something to do with the new font handling, >> or? > > They look fine to me. Have you looked at the screenshot? Maybe it > captures the way things should look rather than how they actually do? Thanks, yes I looked at the screen shot. There is no space between the characters and the underline. To me that is nearly unreadable. It looked much better before the merge I think.