From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug trackers Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:18:53 +0000 Message-ID: <47BB63DD.5000203@gnu.org> References: <20080218052546.GK13020@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080218232829.GM5438@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203463158 24165 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2008 23:19:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Don Armstrong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 20 00:19:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRbkT-0003Xn-3u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:19:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRbjy-00072E-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRbju-000727-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRbjq-00071T-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRbjq-00071Q-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRbjm-0007Yy-Vq; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:18:59 -0500 Original-X-Trace: 44267025/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAPnyukdTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIjDGiYg X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Feb 2008 23:18:57 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89615 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > The issue here is to consider using a bug tracker. To change the way > we package Emacs would be a completely different issue (and I don't > think we should do so). > We wouldn't necessarily need to package Emacs, just partition responsibility for the bug reports as if different parts of Emacs were separate projects. It might be useful for major packages that are already separately developed, like tramp, c-mode and gnus.