From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vinicius Jose Latorre Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:28:54 -0300 Message-ID: <47B65876.7040009@ig.com.br> References: <47A93D3A.90308@gnu.org> <47AA7C97.2020505@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203128772 10330 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2008 02:26:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, rv@gnu.org, mwd@cert.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 03:26:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQCl7-0002L6-Qx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:26:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQCkd-0001mO-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQCka-0001m5-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQCkX-0001lT-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:25:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQCkX-0001lQ-IQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQCkX-0002f5-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQCkW-0008Sk-NW for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQCkT-0002e7-ER for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.245]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQCkS-0002db-S7 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:25:52 -0500 Original-Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 23so565017agd.6 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:25:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=V6sPBx0Ll0ULskm9dpcpd/Ls4TX0bbiKltg8i0EAJc8=; b=wkS7Utf8AKELpvR3cB1Lmy/Vij3LI8Y69kI7iBsiv3wiqmO+ye973CI2X+hWljceyqTa9aNVTyt1s25V6wKUNM/WNmE/DfA7Aqw/RwuoecLlNFegYYee8/jq705jl381nhR4E1MnlNIJwN1/Xg0qapayh55KWocMODL6brVk3TU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=HzhE9YYt4l6BQdJpbv11GUPDgQ3QpySPfSdcZwWmt5nvIm/yCQU0bfbLOZwXH4UHtirNBxt9+F6yAJADrYY4negcTGkT0L1h44wT4UoJ81AYitSvARUY3UyLGq99ZcLvHBw41QSYicIpDCdApuQ4HGz95vC1pBNigoGFZ42wNog= Original-Received: by 10.100.173.18 with SMTP id v18mr5201116ane.69.1203128751434; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:25:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.0.100? ( [201.82.15.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm6116525agb.36.2008.02.15.18.25.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:25:49 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89210 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21127 Archived-At: > I gather that Richard wanted the new functionality to use the > "whitespace" name, which makes some sense, but it seems seems to have > been done rather clumsily in some cases. E.g. the new > "whitespace-buffer" command seems completely different than the old > "whitespace-buffer" command, and really there seems no good reason for > it. > > Vinicius, can you fix up these wrinkles? > Well, indeed the old whitespace-buffer had reported where the bogus whitespace had happened. Instead of reporting, the new whitespace-mode displays visually the bogus whitespace. Is it ok if the new whitespace-buffer is removed? Maybe a better alternative should be to create a whitespace-report command which reports like the old whitespace-buffer. Opinions...