From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image DLLs for the Windows binary of Emacs 22.2 Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:38:27 +0000 Message-ID: <47AF7CE3.9050004@gnu.org> References: <873asf5404.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47A11D80.4050507@gnu.org> <47AF6D15.50305@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202683134 2876 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2008 22:38:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:38:54 +0000 (UTC) To: Jason Rumney , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 23:39:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOKpL-0004vq-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:39:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKos-0000AP-A4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKoo-0000AA-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKom-00009o-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKol-00009l-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOKoi-0008Uu-72; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:32 -0500 Original-X-Trace: 38002239/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAANILr0dTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIpic X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Feb 2008 22:38:30 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88678 Archived-At: Reiner Steib wrote: > Could you please point me to this message? > > It was quoted in your previous mail... ,----[ ] > | From: Jason Rumney > | Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release > | Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel > | Date: 2007-07-02 23:30:53 GMT > | > | Richard Stallman wrote: > | > Is not that a good argument for including them in the binaries then? > | > > | > It is an argument in favor of that. But people say that would be a pain > | > for other reasons. So maybe this is the best compromise. > | > > | > | I must have missed that mail - what was the pain?