From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Display bug with vline.el and viper Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:31:12 +0100 Message-ID: <47976BD0.30401@gmail.com> References: <4794745D.7060006@gmail.com> <47967B24.2010202@gmail.com> <47968E17.9050700@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201106011 12200 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2008 16:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 23 17:33:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHiXt-0005ws-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:33:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHiXT-0001jA-KI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:33:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHiVe-00085s-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:30 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHiVc-00083a-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHiVc-00083I-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHiVb-0002l2-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JHiVb-0003EV-G1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHiVY-0002jv-H2 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHiVU-0002iX-JR; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:20 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:61733 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JHiVS-0005n3-6j; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:31:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080123-1, 2008-01-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JHiVS-0005n3-6j. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JHiVS-0005n3-6j b20fb5d74088f2cfa67dd239b42b8327 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87378 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20729 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > Try to insert: > > (redisplay t) > > At the end of vline-show function. > > If this is something magic, perhaps we need to document in the Lisp > manual the need for this. Can someone propose a patch to the manual? Maybe it is magic, but then the magic is not strong enough for this display bug. But maybe something like that function should be called internally for certain cases? Here it seems like wrapped lines are involved.