From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body finishing with error "Invalid Search Bound" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:50:55 +0100 Message-ID: <478FA38F.40802@gmx.at> References: <200801070421.26583.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <200801162036.07860.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <478E74AD.6090104@gmx.at> <200801162134.42095.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <478F081E.60807@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200596108 25093 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2008 18:55:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, David Golden To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 17 19:55:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFZtW-00005R-3G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:55:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZt7-0001LH-AC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZt0-0001GA-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZsz-0001CQ-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZsy-0001C3-Mu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFZsy-0005Pi-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JFZsx-0006PL-Gb for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFZsu-0005Nz-Da for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFZst-0005NH-Vp for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:40 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2008 18:54:37 -0000 Original-Received: from N832P027.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.47.251]) [62.47.47.251] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 19:54:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+MqQZZ8HSMhXIZVKyhHA/vLHLD8irbmC7AwLmCC8 nXhLzfHRYvPnkh User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87031 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20690 Archived-At: > Maybe a better fix is to make decode-coding-region better preserve > markers: clearly moving markers from the very-end of the region to its > beginning is a bug (as opposed to markers in the middle of the region, > for which it's not necessarily as easy/clear to decide where to move > them to). This should be done by adjust_markers_for_replace anyway. Can this be an idiosyncrasy of the Unicode branch?