From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body finishing with error "Invalid Search Bound" Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: <478E5C2C.7020106@gmx.at> References: <200801070421.26583.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <478DB368.8040605@gmx.at> <200801161633.44000.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <200801161757.17982.david.golden@oceanfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200512000 13969 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2008 19:33:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: David Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 16 20:33:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFE0v-0002yn-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:33:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFE0W-0004R7-Ow for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFE0T-0004Qi-3u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFE0R-0004QO-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFE0R-0004QL-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:32:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFE0Q-0004zZ-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:32:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JFE0Q-0000mD-Dg for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:32:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFE0N-0004yr-8N for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:32:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFE0M-0004yj-QY for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:32:55 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 19:32:53 -0000 Original-Received: from N853P024.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.50.152]) [62.47.50.152] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 20:32:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/4xLV7yEz4KPih3py8Eigx2RzDFrfFD0b5UXcaz0 qjZcgbruZkoTnL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200801161757.17982.david.golden@oceanfree.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86987 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20680 Archived-At: > When rmail-msgend is returning 190 (i.e. when called by > rmail-show-message called by rmail-redecode-body), rmail-message-vector > itself seems to have markers at 1,183,190 instead of 1,183,1176 in it. You would have to find out how they get set up this way. IIUC, `rmail-maybe-set-message-counters' does this near the beginning of `rmail-show-message'. Could you tell me what value it gets there and what the value of `point-max' is, maybe the buffer was narrowed in some strange way and the third value is simply `point-max' (note that the buffer is widened immediately after that). > In rmail-redecode-body, perhaps suspiciously > > (goto-char x-coding-header) > (delete-region (point) > (save-excursion > (beginning-of-line) > (point))) > (insert "X-Coding-System: " > (symbol-name last-coding-system-used)) > ===> (set-marker x-coding-header nil) This just removes a marker that is no more needed in order to not slow down further computations. I think it's not related to your problem.