From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body finishing with error "Invalid Search Bound" Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:03:07 +0100 Message-ID: <478E38CB.5070101@gmx.at> References: <200801070421.26583.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <200801160402.18016.david.golden@oceanfree.net> <478DB368.8040605@gmx.at> <200801161633.44000.david.golden@oceanfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200503317 7607 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2008 17:08:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: David Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 16 18:08:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFBl0-0001w4-9Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:08:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFBkb-0007HG-J1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:08:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFBeI-00012m-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFBeG-00011C-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFBeD-00010l-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFBeE-0000Gx-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JFBeD-0000HB-CH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFBeA-0000G2-Er for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFBeA-0000Fo-0J for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 17:01:47 -0000 Original-Received: from N846P026.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.49.186]) [62.47.49.186] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 18:01:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18bBFxu1mobxG8AnG4cu02CUJcEW6lCxXi4PyDIaa 8L5FpNt309d1Wh User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200801161633.44000.david.golden@oceanfree.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86982 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20677 Archived-At: > Just to check: your system ==> emacs-unicode-2 or cvs head or...? cvs head, otherwise I should be able to reproduce your problem ;-) > in (let ((end (rmail-msgend n))) in rmail-show-message [line 2800] > (rmail-msgend n) is returning 190, which seems, well, wrong. > (n is 1). > > But at top level in rmail buffer, an > M-: (rmail-msgend 1) gives 1176 > - which is different to your value, but at least the right order of > magnitude... Could you try to compare this to the value of `rmail-message-vector'? It's [# # #] here. Then I evaluate (let ((end (rmail-msgend n))) with n = 1 which with the definition (defun rmail-msgend (n) (marker-position (aref rmail-message-vector (1+ n)))) gets me 1146.