From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; DISPLAY env var bug on w32? Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:59:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4788E3DA.3000201@gmail.com> References: <47827356.70005@gmail.com> <200801072103.m07L3bB7017074@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <4782C394.10509@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200153589 27203 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2008 15:59:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 12 17:00:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JDimI-0003cB-D7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:00:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JDilu-0001GK-MR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JDilq-0001Fq-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JDilp-0001FO-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JDilp-0001FK-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDilo-0007CM-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JDilo-0005g1-IK for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDill-0007BX-GG for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDilh-0007AA-Lh; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:59:33 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:65413 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JDilg-0003ht-3Y; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:59:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080112-0, 2008-01-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JDilg-0003ht-3Y. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JDilg-0003ht-3Y bb0f84821cde276f46ce15faa6b814fb X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86805 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20611 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:28:04 +0100 >> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" >> Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier >> >> But I doubt that reverting something is the right fix. At the moment I >> wonder if all that need to be fixed is perhaps emacsclient. Why should >> emacsclient send DISPLAY info to Emacs on w32? > > It shouldn't. I've fixed emacsclient to not notice $DISPLAY on > Windows; please try the latest CVS and see if your problem is gone. It is ok for me. (I have been using a similar patch since I sent that message.) But what about multiple displays on w32?