From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: braydon fuller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: What OS is used By Richard Stallman Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:07:56 -0800 Message-ID: <4782F71C.2030200@braydon.com> References: <477FBD32.30FCBB2E@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0485424702==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199765314 13858 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2008 04:08:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Joost Kremers Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 05:08:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC5lk-0001te-5Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:08:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC5lM-0003yW-VB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC5l7-0003yQ-Cx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC5l5-0003yB-VU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC5l5-0003y8-Pr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from cl35.gs01.gridserver.com ([64.13.192.44]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JC5l5-0001Oa-9K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from 24-205-80-87.dhcp.psdn.ca.charter.com ([24.205.80.87]:32948 helo=[192.168.0.100]) by cl35.gs01.gridserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JC5jk-0001Wc-Qc; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:06:48 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080103) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:50578 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0485424702== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070803000203040303040901" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070803000203040303040901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Joost Kremers wrote: > Ignoramus18728 wrote: > >> On 2008-01-07, Joost Kremers wrote: >> >>> he may, using gnash . >>> >> How do you like this gnash, does it work very well? >> > > i have it installed on my ibook G3 under linux (powerpc, for which there's > no adobe flash player), but i hardly use it. for simple flash stuff it > works ok (not perfect, but ok, although with high cpu load), but anything > that's a bit more complex than just a moving ad usually doesn't function > very well. youtube videos (or any other videos for that matter) don't work > for me at all. > Running on many systems is one of the great things going for Gnash. > however, i once read a review of gnash that was much more positive. the > writer said most flash stuff works, and he had little trouble watching > youtube videos. so perhaps it's my setup or a bad configuration or > something. > > big disadvantage, IMHO: gnash requires the boost library, and that took > forever to compile. really. i've compiled firefox a couple of times in the > past, and i've compiled kernels on this ibook, and they didn't take as long > as boost did... > > > I'm not a C or C++ hacker, but from what I hear using C++ and using Boost, while easier to maintain, doesn't have the performance of writing in C. Is this true? --------------070803000203040303040901 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Joost Kremers wrote:
Ignoramus18728 wrote:
  
On 2008-01-07, Joost Kremers <joostkremers@yahoo.com> wrote:
    
he may, using gnash <http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/>.
      
How do you like this gnash, does it work very well?
    

i have it installed on my ibook G3 under linux (powerpc, for which there's
no adobe flash player), but i hardly use it. for simple flash stuff it
works ok (not perfect, but ok, although with high cpu load), but anything
that's a bit more complex than just a moving ad usually doesn't function
very well. youtube videos (or any other videos for that matter) don't work
for me at all.
  
Running on many systems is one of the great things going for Gnash.
however, i once read a review of gnash that was much more positive. the
writer said most flash stuff works, and he had little trouble watching
youtube videos. so perhaps it's my setup or a bad configuration or
something.

big disadvantage, IMHO: gnash requires the boost library, and that took
forever to compile. really. i've compiled firefox a couple of times in the
past, and i've compiled kernels on this ibook, and they didn't take as long
as boost did...


  
I'm not a C or C++ hacker, but from what I hear using C++ and using Boost, while easier to maintain, doesn't have the performance of writing in C. Is this true?

--------------070803000203040303040901-- --===============0485424702== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ help-gnu-emacs mailing list help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs --===============0485424702==--