From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: nxml-mode faces Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:04:27 +0000 Message-ID: <476A928B.2060708@f2s.com> References: <4767CFA3.10201@f2s.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198229567 16754 80.91.229.12 (21 Dec 2007 09:32:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:32:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 21 10:32:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J5eFU-0002OH-2G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:32:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5eF9-0008Qe-VL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:32:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J5eF5-0008Nh-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J5eF2-0008JQ-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5eF2-0008Iz-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:32:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J5eF2-0000CF-EX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:32:28 -0500 Original-X-Trace: 2542241/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@f2s.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAALchakdTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIqho Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [192.168.249.28]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Dec 2007 16:04:35 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85343 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > Does anyone have any objection to the patch below, which makes use of > existing font-lock faces rather than inventing an entirely separate > color scheme? > > On general principles, that's a change for the better. > But I don't know any details about this mode. > As the only replies have been positive, I have checked the changes in, along with Mile's suggestion to remove the -face suffix from face names.