From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: longlines-mode and comments Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:11:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4766F42C.1030903@gmx.at> References: <3E823B74-5830-445A-8DEE-51A4AB4AFB44@gmail.com> <474E95A7.4090807@gmx.at> <35DB6480-F9E8-47C3-843F-0FA6BB4B5A94@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197929757 22259 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2007 22:15:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: David Reitter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 17 23:16:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J4OFk-0002of-86 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OFR-0004Sr-3F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:15:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OBd-0002Ru-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:11:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OBb-0002Qu-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:11:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OBb-0002Qq-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:11:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4OBa-0004wl-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:11:42 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2007 22:11:40 -0000 Original-Received: from N830P016.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.47.176]) [62.47.47.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 17 Dec 2007 23:11:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+/n+Ztq0+/78wQDcey3AcJG7J2+XxqD7KFNRoZPV /b6Oh9OaqM/EPL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <35DB6480-F9E8-47C3-843F-0FA6BB4B5A94@gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17182 Archived-At: > It seems like `longlines-wrap-line' has a provision for the case, but > it doesn't work (I don't understand that code). What does work is to > not comment wrap lines at all until a better solution is found. For some reason my Emacs hangs with your patch. > ! (unless (nth 4 (syntax-ppss (point))) I think this should be tested iff a comment syntax has been defined by the current major mode. Moreover, the line should be wrapped when the actual comment is not terminated by a newline.