From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is not end-of-defun-function buffer local? Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:53:39 +0100 Message-ID: <475E8853.2070801@gmx.at> References: <4759ED09.7060601@gmail.com> <475ADCA4.1020506@gmail.com> <475B48A7.2030509@gmail.com> <475BE75A.9030507@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197377649 5465 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2007 12:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 13:54:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J24ct-0001jQ-Bz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:54:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J24cb-0006Lv-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J24cF-0005vi-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J24cD-0005tR-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:53:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J24cD-0005tB-EB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J24cC-000403-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2007 12:53:33 -0000 Original-Received: from N844P003.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.49.99]) [62.47.49.99] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 11 Dec 2007 13:53:33 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+MalkVUBKMlmWlxVvjp2nCli0ghH41MdQrFFu0HR zsQ/4kpetPF0SC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85042 Archived-At: > The "automatically local when set" is of course making it yet > a bit messier. Not sure what we should do about that. I'm still missing you. Consider (defvar foo 0) (let ((this-buffer (current-buffer))) (set (make-local-variable 'foo) 1) (let ((foo 2)) (with-temp-buffer "*foo*" (let ((foo 3)) (with-current-buffer this-buffer foo))))) Doesn't this exhibit the same "deep binding" behavior as `make-variable-buffer-local'?