From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: trunk r116526: Document some frame and window changes in NEWS. Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:37:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47578203-9ce9-43b1-bf2f-eb4e322d3983@default> References: <5309368D.5060908@gmx.at> <5309D32C.9060502@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393177053 28914 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2014 17:37:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics , Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 23 18:37:41 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHczk-0008TV-RE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:37:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHczk-00029Z-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:37:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHczZ-00026q-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:37:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHczQ-0000P7-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:37:29 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:36026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHczP-0000Ox-Tf; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:37:20 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s1NHbFGO022605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:37:16 GMT Original-Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1NHbDH9016889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:37:14 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1NHbDgW027513; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:37:13 GMT In-Reply-To: <5309D32C.9060502@gmx.at> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.81 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169822 Archived-At: > BTW, is "pixelwise" a very bad term? Should I > generally try to use "in units of pixels" instead? It is not a bad term, depending on what you use it for. "-wise" means with respect to, concerning, in the manner of, in the direction of, and so on. So pixelwise is more general than just using a pixel as the unit of measure. So yes, if you want to specify that pixels are used for measurement then it would be clearer to say "in pixels" or similar.