From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: invisible Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:30:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4747FD49.80702@gmx.at> References: <20040225.150142.12214540.kazu@iijlab.net> <200402282128.i1SLSuY15359@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200402290224.i1T2Oip15705@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87sl3fdqs3.fsf@escher.local.home> <87zlxc5r2f.fsf@escher.local.home> <474059CD.1060107@gmx.at> <87r6ihi1z7.fsf@escher.local.home> <4746E2CF.4010604@gmx.at> <87k5o8q0y5.fsf@escher.local.home> <4747312D.7020605@gmx.at> <87fxywpuuy.fsf@escher.local.home> <47474B8C.9020806@gmx.at> <87bq9kpnqd.fsf@escher.local.home> <4747EFE8.5090405@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195900162 17809 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2007 10:29:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW4gQm9ja2fDpXJk?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 24 11:29:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IvsGN-0006m7-5F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:29:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvsG8-0001kh-F3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvsG3-0001hQ-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:29:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvsG0-0001dt-Cb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvsG0-0001dk-AY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IvsFz-0007SP-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2007 10:29:02 -0000 Original-Received: from N771P012.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.40.76]) [62.47.40.76] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2007 11:29:02 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/emrRsJcTeap5FOqH1B4xD0SfZwa4RNVB1vJ7iqP yQ4duFtUSF7ki8 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84039 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20357 Archived-At: > I haven't been following the thread, but is this what you are talking > about? > > Ordinarily, functions that operate on text or move point do not care > whether the text is invisible. The user-level line motion commands > explicitly ignore invisible newlines if `line-move-ignore-invisible' > is non-`nil' (the default), but only because they are explicitly > programmed to do so. > > However, if a command ends with point inside or immediately before > invisible text, the main editing loop moves point further forward or > further backward (in the same direction that the command already > moved it) until that condition is no longer true. Yes. But where in the code does set_point_both base its decision on whether a "command ends"?