From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: invisible Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:52:12 +0100 Message-ID: <47474B8C.9020806@gmx.at> References: <20040225.150142.12214540.kazu@iijlab.net> <200402282128.i1SLSuY15359@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200402290224.i1T2Oip15705@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87sl3fdqs3.fsf@escher.local.home> <87zlxc5r2f.fsf@escher.local.home> <474059CD.1060107@gmx.at> <87r6ihi1z7.fsf@escher.local.home> <4746E2CF.4010604@gmx.at> <87k5o8q0y5.fsf@escher.local.home> <4747312D.7020605@gmx.at> <87fxywpuuy.fsf@escher.local.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040501050904090200000707" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195854697 22119 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2007 21:51:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 23 22:51:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IvgR1-0006nP-0u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:51:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvgQm-0002WT-Cj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:51:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvgQi-0002TV-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:51:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvgQg-0002PW-BE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:51:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvgQg-0002P6-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IvgQf-0005a7-L0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:51:17 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2007 21:51:16 -0000 Original-Received: from N739P001.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.65]) [62.47.36.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 23 Nov 2007 22:51:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/CS2oUQxrCL1UTvRyw1IbkE6r2SLXHiG4z26/J6r WKPSExwVEyvcE4 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <87fxywpuuy.fsf@escher.local.home> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84011 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20353 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040501050904090200000707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > It's the same as before: C-p skips lines 5 and 3 with rear-nonsticky > nil, does not skip with rear-nonsticky t, and (forward-line -1) does not > skip regardless of rear-nonstickiness. I tested on GNU Emacs 23.0.50.1 > (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2007-11-21. Could the > differences between what you and I see be related to the EOL difference > between MS Windows and Unix? Can other users of these systems who are > following this thread try these tests and report their observations? Hmmm... I think I see why you don't see it. With emacs -Q visit the attached file, evaluate fl-1 and the first progn, move point before line7 and do M-x fl-1 twice. Undo the changes, evaluate the second progn and do the same movement again. Can you see the difference now? --------------040501050904090200000707 Content-Type: text/plain; name="lmii.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="lmii.txt" line1 line2 line3 line4 line5 line6 line7 (defun fl-1 () (interactive) (forward-line -1)) (progn (add-text-properties 12 13 '(invisible t)) (add-text-properties 18 19 '(invisible t)) (add-text-properties 24 25 '(invisible t)) (add-text-properties 30 31 '(invisible t)) (setq line-move-ignore-invisible nil)) (progn (add-text-properties 12 13 '(invisible t rear-nonsticky t)) (add-text-properties 18 19 '(invisible t rear-nonsticky t)) (add-text-properties 24 25 '(invisible t rear-nonsticky t)) (add-text-properties 30 31 '(invisible t rear-nonsticky t)) (setq line-move-ignore-invisible nil)) --------------040501050904090200000707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel --------------040501050904090200000707--