From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: mark_object crash in 22.1 and latest CVS (as of tonight) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:09:31 +0100 Message-ID: <473E232B.9090009@gmx.at> References: <16af2f430711081955j3d5e6745gc0f7a50e02d9a892@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711090332x39c8c768gb01d1dc6a0e4f427@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711120340q27926877tf976ef397d12df16@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711140939x45663644je0dce25c8796b18@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711150038u692d7c5cw27666e11271d7f83@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711161248o431ff3b8hdd7f6abb835e3d67@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195254540 28132 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2007 23:09:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kalman Reti , emacs-devel@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 17 00:09:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItAJ1-0004PM-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:09:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAIo-000646-BR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:08:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAI4-0005G1-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAI4-0005FP-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:08:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAI3-0005F1-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:07:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ItAI3-0002zV-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:07:59 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2007 23:07:57 -0000 Original-Received: from N755P022.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.38.86]) [62.47.38.86] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 17 Nov 2007 00:07:57 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+aBdQ50E6aJerKLWqItx3DKP+B6KFPhoMga0bvP+ kyoz1bX9XvUW72 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83389 gmane.emacs.bugs:16995 Archived-At: > Agreed. The field was moved by Richard on 14-Oct-2002 but the change > log doesn't say why this was done, so I just undid it. Does this mean those cells always survived the current cycle? Then we now have a chance to test whether the "remove unmarked markers from the undo list" stuff really works in one and the same collection cycle. Interesting. Stefan, unless you have already done so, could you please fix those identic "If a buffer's undo list is Qt, ..." comments in alloc.c too? The second mentions truncate_undo_list which hardly makes sense.