From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recenter-top-bottom Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:23:13 +0100 Message-ID: <473B9171.5040000@gmail.com> References: <874pfotmxr.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195086214 9177 80.91.229.12 (15 Nov 2007 00:23:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 15 01:23:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IsSW9-0007GZ-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:23:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsSVw-0002Ou-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IsSVt-0002OW-Q3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:23:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IsSVp-0002Le-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsSVp-0002LT-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IsSVo-0004QM-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63685 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IsSVl-0000jo-93; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:23:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <874pfotmxr.fsf@jurta.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071114-0, 2007-11-14), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1IsSVl-0000jo-93. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1IsSVl-0000jo-93 c4c4866998356e9ff9f8c9871736b579 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83219 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: >> The starting position of the window determines the cycling order: >> If initially in the top or middle third: top -> middle -> bottom. >> If initially in the bottom third: bottom -> middle -> top. > > But why it does `middle -> bottom -> top' if initially in the middle third? > I think `middle -> top -> bottom' would be much more convenient! Agreed.