From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recenter-top-bottom Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:09:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4731C715.9080607@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194444610 32201 80.91.229.12 (7 Nov 2007 14:10:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie_JWA Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 07 15:10:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IplbY-0007hw-5E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IplbN-0004E5-0D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:09:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IplbG-0004C1-A6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:09:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IplbE-00049j-4n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IplbD-00049N-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:09:43 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iplb6-0005ib-1v; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:09:36 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63159 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Iplb3-0002VH-6R; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:09:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071106-0, 2007-11-06), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Iplb3-0002VH-6R. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Iplb3-0002VH-6R 768ff9432759f4f802a2526b2f0160dd X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82736 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie_JWA wrote: > [Apologies for the lack of threading, etc.] > > > With a prefix arg, it's the same as `recenter'. Otherwise, it > alternately > > moves the current line to the center, top, and bottom of the > window. In > > this, it's a bit like `C-M-l'. It's a trivial change, but I find > it useful - > > I have no need for repeated `C-l' to keep doing the same thing. > > > It looks good to me. What do others think? > > I wouldn't like it, because I'd find it too slow. I've In what way is it slower when todays binding of C-l?