From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does not rgrep use "grep -r"? Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:54:15 +0100 Message-ID: <472C6167.8000706@gmail.com> References: <472B99AB.3090705@gmail.com> <87ve8k8dyw.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <472BB921.20104@gmail.com> <87d4us6rnl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <472BD29F.5090205@gmail.com> <877il06ltg.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85bqabslzs.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194090888 7854 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2007 11:54:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 03 12:54:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IoHaT-0000uq-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:54:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoHaJ-0006k6-4c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:54:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoHaF-0006hc-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:54:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoHaD-0006du-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoHaD-0006dd-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IoHa1-0003FH-Oz; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:54:22 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63491 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IoHZz-0001nY-6M; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:54:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071103-0, 2007-11-03), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1IoHZz-0001nY-6M. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1IoHZz-0001nY-6M 2a0eabaf72e6fd7a3d27e3391bc67422 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82423 Archived-At: Another difference is the caching of output data. When I use lgrep I see the output immediately, but with rgrep (which uses find etc) it looks to me like it takes much longer time for the output be visible. (I am using w32.)