From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: desupporting X10 and old X11 releases Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:33:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4726DE4B.1050509@swipnet.se> References: <87odfcggvl.fsf@jurta.org> <87hckk9uoa.fsf@jurta.org> <87abqcrq9p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <471BE5D3.3050007@gmail.com> <87y7dwq7x9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87odepv21n.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ir4wjcev.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <200710261516.l9QFGQ7C001069@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710261941.l9QJfcH0010503@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710271728.l9RHSk8B019811@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710281645.l9SGjEO7024789@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <472 58C01.70608@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193729662 29482 80.91.229.12 (30 Oct 2007 07:34:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 30 08:34:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ImlcB-0007os-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:34:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Imlc1-0005KO-LR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Imlbx-0005IK-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Imlbv-0005FD-AB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Imlbv-0005Et-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Imlbk-0007NO-1v; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.185]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Imlbh-0001PX-OP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: by av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3A20C384B2; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:33:37 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1382C384A7; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:33:37 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (90-231-102-24-no59.tbcn.telia.com [90.231.102.24]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BDC37E4B; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:33:36 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82127 Eli Zaretskii skrev: >> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:30:09 +0100 >> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= >> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> I don't know if oldXMenu is used (it is kind of strange looking :-), but it >> compiles and works. But I suspect that those that can't use any X toolkit use >> Lucid. I'd say we can get rid of it. > > Sorry for my failing memory, but isn't oldXMenu used for > non-USE_X_TOOLKIT compilation of xmenu.c? Yes. > If so, I wouldn't recommend > deleting it, because that's currently the only way to build and test > that branch of xmenu.c (the other build which used to use it was the > MSDOS port, but it's broken on the trunk for the time being). We > might need it again if and when someone writes the code to support > menus on a Unix text terminal. IMHO, possible future development is not a good reason to keep almost unused code. After all, the code is in CVS if it is needed in the future. Also, adding menu code is as easy in the toolkit code as in the non-toolkit code. The main difference is that the non-toolkit code does not use callbacks. Otherwise there is much duplication. Jan D.