Re: which of the many .el's is best for (simple?) html, etc?

["Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>]

David Combs wrote:
> Here's the page in emacswiki that lists the various
> emacs-packages that pertain to creating web-pages. 
> 
> Which are your favorites?  (Why?)
> 
> Which are capable and yet easy to learn?
> 
> THANKS!
> 
> David
> 
> 
> Here's that category-page (via lynx):
> 
> 
> 
>    #[1]Emacs Wiki with page content [2]Emacs Wiki with page content and
>    diff [3]Emacs Wiki including minor differences
> 
>    [4][Home] [5]SiteMap [6]Search [7]ElispArea [8]HowTo [9]RecentChanges
>    [10]News [11]Problems [12]Suggestions
> 
>    Search: [13]____________________
> 
> [14]CategoryHypermedia
...
>      * [27]NxhtmlMode - Editing XHTML files. Based on [28]NxmlMode, but
>        with enhanced completion for XHTML and support for multiple major
>        modes ([29]MuMaMo).

Since no one else mention it I speak for nXhtml. It uses the powerful 
nXml emacs package that makes it easy to write correct html code 
(completion, error detecting). The web pages contains more information.

I have tried to make this easy for both a beginner and a power-user. If 
you try it I would be glad for some feedback.

You need Emacs 22 to use it. (Which of the other modes/packages on that 
page above works in Emacs 22?)