From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:58:46 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <46a1cce6-a81a-827d-24d5-184e079bfd2d@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87y270bazi.fsf@yahoo.com> <87sfx8b6ta.fsf@yahoo.com> <46728405-9441-4e3d-be5e-75e1bceaee70@gmail.com> <87h7doj7ku.fsf@gnus.org> <83v923pmtf.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26yfry0.fsf@gnus.org> <834k9mqqrm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34313"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ideasman42@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 21:59:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maNw7-0008lu-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:59:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maNw6-0007yI-Fs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maNvH-0006sZ-On for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:44182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maNvF-0001s7-KH; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513291600BB; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id NO4NKqsmVG_l; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F8B1600D0; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id B4G18xWsl2YB; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [131.179.64.200] (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66D811600BB; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <834k9mqqrm.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=131.179.128.68; envelope-from=eggert@cs.ucla.edu; helo=zimbra.cs.ucla.edu X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276830 Archived-At: On 10/12/21 07:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The latter, I think. It's too late to fix that, sorry. Especially as > Paul installed quite a few more changes, and I have no idea whether > they somehow assume that one. They should be independent. I thought it was a bugfix since it addressed a FIXME and it fixed a performance bug on OpenBSD. But if you'd rather I reverted on emacs-28 and installed on master instead, I can volunteer to do that.