From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mouse-autoselect-window Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:46:43 +0100 Message-ID: <46E1F0F3.8010507@gnu.org> References: <87odgff933.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> <46E112BD.80705@gmx.at> <38367.128.165.123.18.1189180468.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189212429 23270 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2007 00:47:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 00:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, drew.adams@oracle.com, jeremy@jeremyms.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 02:47:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IToTa-0007WJ-EB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:47:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IToTY-0006r5-9o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IToTV-0006qv-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IToTS-0006pm-Hz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:46:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IToTS-0006pg-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:46:58 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IToTM-0002nr-4m; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7318652015; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:46:50 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78209 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > No, it isn't necessary. The fact that it's necessary on X is because > there's no better way. But MS-Windows doesn't have that problem, so > there's no need for that kludge. > I'm not convinced Windows magically avoids the problem here. If you use a focus follows mouse policy on Windows and set focus-follows-mouse to nil, what happens when you start an ediff session then move the mouse slightly (keeping it over the main frame)?