From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug of display-table & make-glyph-code Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:02:42 +0200 Message-ID: <46E105A2.4000609@gmx.at> References: <200708271732.22306.zslevin@gmail.com> <46DD9F41.8090700@gmx.at> <46DE63EE.3070509@gmx.at> <46DE7DBA.90408@gmx.at> <46DEE8AB.9050203@gmx.at> <46DFBF17.4010702@gmx.at> <7utzq71c7s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189154391 31938 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 08:39:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 10:39:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITZNV-0006y2-OO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:39:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZNU-00083i-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:39:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZNG-0007to-Vs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZNF-0007ru-8A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZNE-0007ra-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:39:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITZND-0001YY-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Sep 2007 08:39:30 -0000 Original-Received: from N795P012.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.43.76]) [62.47.43.76] by mail.gmx.net (mp043) with SMTP; 07 Sep 2007 10:39:30 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/VCHoTibTVALSczmAGPeQK7WgE5kmgYsq4zrlsJZ bV3BLyXfbPN9Fu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <7utzq71c7s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78119 Archived-At: >>Mapping dired-warning to font-lock-warning-face was a bad idea: The >>latter is already used for marking and flagging. > > > Does that matter? The marking and flagging faces seem to be applied to > the file name. The warning face seems only to be applied to the > permissions. So it's not like they overlap or anything. Good. > And I think a > warning should be displayed in, umm, a warning face (so it has > emphasis), rather than a comment face (so it is subdued). That's what I thought in the first place. Using `font-lock-warning-face' is an "incompatible" change though, hence I would have to document it in NEWS?