From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug of display-table & make-glyph-code Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:08:43 +0200 Message-ID: <46E06C5B.80408@gmx.at> References: <200708271732.22306.zslevin@gmail.com> <46DD9F41.8090700@gmx.at> <46DE63EE.3070509@gmx.at> <87wsv4fvav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <46DFC3AE.3020009@gmx.at> <46E0136F.6080602@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189112920 30339 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2007 21:08:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 23:08:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITOaS-00068q-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:08:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITOaQ-0002In-Cr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:08:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITOZf-0001Kt-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITOZe-0001J7-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITOZe-0001I6-Lj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITOZd-0007or-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Sep 2007 21:07:36 -0000 Original-Received: from N939P017.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.61.81]) [62.47.61.81] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 06 Sep 2007 23:07:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/KetgQ1zTKWgf5RtR9Z7BpwpheboSy5ErFYlTTq0 UR7fGJbD4/rl/4 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78037 Archived-At: > I understand. But I'd just want a clearer explanation about why that would > be a better choice in general (or even in his particular case). He wants a window of the same size display the same buffer in the same area of the same frame, whatever he's doing.