From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we relax requirement from gtk 2.6 to gtk 2.4. Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:04:40 +0200 Message-ID: <46DFC2A8.7070200@swipnet.se> References: <87ejhc9ode.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189069503 673 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2007 09:05:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:05:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 11:05:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITDIN-0006q1-De for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:05:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITDIL-0006PG-B4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITDIG-0006Mg-RY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITDIE-0006Ie-KV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:04:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITDIE-0006I6-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from av9-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.180]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITDID-0007gF-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: by av9-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9F85F3814B; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:04:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.92]) by av9-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5464B38131 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:04:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (81-235-205-78-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.78]) by smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7F137E53 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:04:52 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) In-Reply-To: <87ejhc9ode.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77958 Archived-At: David Hansen skrev: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:59:10 +0100 Leo wrote: > >> On 2007-09-05 23:33 +0100, David Koppelman wrote: >>> Recently Emacs changed the gtk version from 2.4? to 2.6, perhaps to >>> accommodate a use of gtk_image_new_from_icon_name and >>> gtk_image_set_from_icon_name. If that's all, then perhaps it would be >>> better to use 2.4-compatible functions to do the same thing. >> 2.10 has been out for a long time. What's the merit of using 2.4? > > Cairo dependency or was that added later? > 2.8 AFAIK. Jan D.