From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?) Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:16:46 +0100 Message-ID: <46DC255E.30103@gnu.org> References: <86k5re4blv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86fy224aah.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86bqcq4a4q.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291604.l7TG4atk011108@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <867ine492x.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <863ay24826.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291641.l7TGfo2t012413@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708310812.l7V8Cgq9022040@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86lkbnygii.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188832651 22165 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2007 15:17:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Randal L. Schwartz" To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 03 17:17:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISDg3-0002q2-KS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:17:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISDfx-0000mq-Ls for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISDfu-0000mZ-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:17:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISDft-0000mG-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISDfs-0000mD-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISDfs-0004HH-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (host81-149-25-51.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.149.25.51]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489BE524DF; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:17:06 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77656 Archived-At: dhruva wrote: > The above proposition is based on a very top level view I have on this > topic not knowing the real efforts involved. I am no way trying to > undermine the efforts of the fellow developers that has gone in to the > creation of multi-tty and merging of it to the HEAD. > We already discussed this at length a few months ago, and decided to merge multi-tty first. The real work is in merging the unicode branch with multi-tty whichever direction it is done in, as both branches were being kept up to date with the trunk already, so I don't see it making much difference, and certainly not worth the effort to go back and redo it now.