From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Display problems after lots of different (generated) images have been shown Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:00:28 +0100 Message-ID: <46C8AF6C.4090205@gnu.org> References: <46C89F89.9010001@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187557254 27703 80.91.229.12 (19 Aug 2007 21:00:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Michael Schierl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 19 23:00:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IMrtB-0006ur-DS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:00:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMrtB-0006Ix-Lq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMrt9-0006Iq-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMrt9-0006Ie-Cq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMrt9-0006IX-6G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IMrt8-0003ee-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:00:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C00518D3; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:00:40 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <46C89F89.9010001@gmx.de> X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:16393 Archived-At: Michael Schierl wrote: > If I still used Win98 I'd say it is a lack of GDI objects, but I am > using WinXP and do not think one could reach the GDI object limit there. > You can find out if this is the problem by starting the Task Manager (Ctrl-Alt-Del) and while looking at the Processes tab, select the "Select Columns..." option from the View menu. There should be an option to show the number of GDI objects in use by each process. The limit on XP seems to be 9999 per process (you do seem to be inserting more images than that). > I am sure that I do not hold any stale references to these images, but > it seems that they still consume some kind of resources. Killing buffers > or running M-x garbage-collect does not help either. > Try M-: (clear-image-cache)