From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:30:53 +0100
Message-ID: <46898AAD.4030205@gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICKEEIDNAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>	<uy7iskg91.fsf@gnu.org>	<v9ps44uogx.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>	<uir9vk3td.fsf@gnu.org>	<466C80A3.1040102@gnu.org>	<E1HxgS3-0008No-Vm@fencepost.gnu.org>	<466D34C5.8050604@gnu.org>	<E1Hy8nK-0008Q5-Jd@fencepost.gnu.org>	<v9lke2zobw.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>	<4686267A.8050001@swipnet.se>	<v9myyh7m7z.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>	<E1I4nKj-0002nQ-Iz@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<4686F6F9.1070307@gmail.com>	<E1I52Kk-0006np-ST@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<4688111D.6090501@gmail.com> <E1I5Rs1-0006cV-2y@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183419065 31874 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2007 23:31:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:31:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>,
	Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 01:31:03 2007
connect(): Connection refused
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1I5VME-0002gm-KN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:31:02 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I5VMD-0006s3-V7
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:31:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I5VMA-0006rc-Er
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:30:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I5VM8-0006rE-SP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:30:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5VM8-0006rB-NB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:30:56 -0400
Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jasonr@gnu.org>)
	id 1I5VM7-0005em-DR; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:30:55 -0400
Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108])
	by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ACD8550D2A; Tue,  3 Jul 2007 00:30:54 +0100 (BST)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
In-Reply-To: <E1I5Rs1-0006cV-2y@fencepost.gnu.org>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74214
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/74214>

Richard Stallman wrote:
>     Is not that a good argument for including them in the binaries then?
>
> It is an argument in favor of that.  But people say that would be a pain
> for other reasons.  So maybe this is the best compromise.
>   

I must have missed that mail - what was the pain?