From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A wish, a plea Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:51:24 +0100 Message-ID: <467BC5CC.3030506@gnu.org> References: <4679F561.4030600@hacksaw.org> <87d4zomyiw.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fy4kjy0k.fsf@red-bean.com> <467AF6CC.2000300@gnu.org> <86ejk4jtno.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <877ipwqtg9.fsf@red-bean.com> <86ejk4i2gn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182516724 31020 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2007 12:52:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , wilde@sha-bang.de, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, hacksaw@hacksaw.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 22 14:51:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I1icG-0006id-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:51:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1icF-0004gA-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1icC-0004da-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1icB-0004cs-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1icB-0004cn-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:51:51 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I1ic6-0004yY-Jp; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05887518D8; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:51:27 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) In-Reply-To: <86ejk4i2gn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73615 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > Being reminded of Notepad and Word is not in itself good or bad. > Could you explain where the peskiness lies? > You came up with one good source of peskiness yourself: > Uh, it has the nasty side effect of starting to write to my disk > without asking my confirmation. If I have started several Emacs > instances, I don't want them complaining about file locks and similar > nonsense just because I use the *scratch* buffer in both. >